Triggs is running for gpverner, and I desided that I will also run. The main thing that I want to know is if you guys think he should we without some against him.
My personal opinion is that Triggs shouldn't have someone running against him.
Part of the agreement of the Syndicate becoming less military, more political, is that a place where the Syndicate controlled, stayed controlled politically.
Also, Triggs as a Governor would personify his description as a Leader, and it would be interesting to know what he would do if given the opportunity and power.
If you wish to run against me, you can, although I will be interested to hear everyone else's opinion.
I won't be a good Governer for the heroes you mean? :P
To give the rpg a sense of realism, all candidates for political office must reach age requirements and realistically qualify to hold office. Triggs has already done so. Plus, he's also made a decent speech. Scott would have to age 20 years, get the qualifications, and give a legitimate argument as to why he should win over Triggs.
I see your sense of realism, but Scott and your character are the same age in the game and we both left for NY when we should have been in school, so I say let's just go with it and make Triggs win.
Leaving school is one thing (kids do it all the time), but running for governor is different. You can do it, but your character needs to be at least 35.